Gursky’s Print Goes for $4.5 Million, Observers Say: Huh?

© Andreas Gursky/courtesy Christie's

A print of Andreas Gursky’s “Rhein II” sold for $4.33 million last week, making it the most expensive photo ever sold at auction. This might be considered good news for the fine-art photography market, but most of the press about the sale has ranged from puzzlement to downright mockery.

Some of the criticism is of the predictable, my-4-year-old-could-do-that type of scoffing, but some seems to be genuinely wrestling with just how stark and plain this digitally retouched image looks, at least online. We can’t remember anyone writing this way about Gursky’s previous record setter, the diptych “99 Cent Store,” or about the Cindy Sherman self portrait that is now the second most expensive photo ever sold.

Here are some sample comments about Gursky’s “Rhein II”:

“It’s nice. Is it $4.33 million nice? We don’t get art sometimes. Okay, all the time.”
–Dan Amira, New York magazine

“…While it is hard to argue that he [Gursky] has achieved his aim – it is even harder to see why someone would pay a substantial sum of money to own the piece.
But the digitally altered – and some might say visually uninteresting – ‘Rhine II’ has become the most expensive photograph ever sold at auction.”
–Charles Walford, The Daily Mail

“It’s not worth a penny over $4.2 million if you ask me, but at least one collector disagrees.”
–Amy Rolph, Seattle Post Intelligencer

“This mediocre pic is the most expensive photo in the world, worth $4.3 million dollars. Behold!  It’s some…grass…and we’re pretty sure that’s a– lake?  Right?  Maybe?”
-Jo Pincushion on (a sports radio station’s Web site. Zheesh, everyone’s a critic.)

One dissenting voice is that of Florence Walters. Writing in the Telegraph, she says,  “This image is a vibrant, beautiful and memorable – I should say unforgettable – contemporary twist on Germany’s famed genre and favorite theme: the romantic landscape, and man’s relationship with nature.” She also notes, “For all its apparent simplicity, the photograph is a statement of dedication to its craft.”

For those who would like to judge for themselves, other prints from the same edition are in the collections of the Museum of Modern Art in New York, the Tate Modern in London, Munich’s Pinakothek der Modern, and the Glenstone Collection in Potomac, Maryland.

Related Story:

Andreas Gursky’s $4.3 Million Print Sets New Record

Tags: , , ,

7 Responses to “Gursky’s Print Goes for $4.5 Million, Observers Say: Huh?”

  1. Cool Stuff – November 14, 2011 | The Blog @ Says:

    […] world’s most expensive photo just sold for $4.33 million. Art critics and observers are […]

  2. Michael Says:

    From reading similar comments on G+ I’m starting to think the less than positive comments are from artisan photographers and not artists or art lovers… which is a distinction that photography in general has been wreslting with for many years.

  3. Jim Says:

    The emperor has no clothes.

  4. JustJealousJustJealous Says:

    The ultra rich collectors have their own competitions amongst themselves. To have this very limited “Gursky” trophy makes other uber rich collectors jealous. None of them care what Joe Public thinks.

  5. tina Says:

    Hey Gursky ! you must be laughing all the way to the bank!

    I say, it is a one dull piece of whatever you want to call it.

  6. tim Says:

    sorry, but there is a german saying: wenn ihr es nicht erfuehlet, erjaget ihr es nimmer mehr.(Goethe)
    if you don´t feel it, you won´t caught it. 😉

  7. andrew Krucko Says:

    Good on him if someone wants to pay that much for it! …..geez talk about tall poppy syndrome!